"He said I was unequipped to meet life because I had no sense of humor."

Wednesday, December 18, 2013

I Finally Felt The Thing Everyone Says And It Didn’t Feel Good

I should start with this – never, that I can remember, have I been bitter, resentful or angry about any of the health crises that I have experienced (I wrote ‘that have happened to me, but that didn’t feel right). I have gone so far as to say that I would rather this or that thing not have happened, kind of in the same way I might say that I’d rather it not be raining. My kidney failure and subsequent adventures have not felt more or less than the trials that everyone experiences at some point in their lives. I believe that we are all tested and prodded by life in uncomfortable and unpredictable ways.

I’m not claiming any kind of hero status (see previous post). There are moments for me that are more difficult than others, and times when I recognize that the specific moments of my life are fairly unique to me, and that I am afforded a certain deference for my body. That being said, I have yet to meet someone with whom I would trade maladies.

In my life I have heard from people, almost from day one of the kidney times, that I’m too young for this to happen to me. That is it unfair that I have to face this, that I don’t deserve this. I understand that saying ‘you’re too young’ is a form of sympathy. It can be a way of people saying I’m sorry that this happened to you. At the same time it feels as though these expressions are appealing to a greater order in the world. In the movie ‘50/50’ (which is fabulous), Joseph Gordon-Levitt’s character is diagnosed with cancer. He is shocked, claiming his healthy lifestyle - ‘I don’t smoke, I exercise, I eat well … I recycle …’  It was a pointed joke - as though we can somehow inoculate ourselves against these random and painful crises.  

As you know the past few months have been a difficult time for me, health-wise. This week I’m trying to schedule the surgery to have one of my native kidneys taken out. I’m trying to miss the least amount of class time at school, and to have it as soon as possible. The mass in the kidney is likely renal cell carcinoma, which is a particularly nasty cancer. It is well contained, but still – it feels like I have a time bomb in my back. One doctor is saying to wait three months because of the blood clot, and that the clot is already resolved. I’m trying to have it a bit sooner – two or two and a half months. Scheduling this is a headache. [UPDATE: As of yesterday the surgery is scheduled for January 22nd! Which is good – get it over with.]

Yesterday, carrying these decisions and stress, for the very first time, I entertained the thought that maybe I AM too young for all this to have happened. That I deserve a life without the constant overhanging stress of when I will be in the hospital next, or when I will need to deal with another unforeseen side-effect. Why did this have to happen to me?

These thoughts were immediately followed by the humility they call for – what do I ‘deserve’ from life? What does life owe me? Is there a contract somewhere that promises a smooth ride, with a few bumps when we are seasoned enough to weather them? This is clearly not how life works. Worse – as I thought about the phantom life I could be leading, my feelings were not hopeful or energized. I felt bitter and angry, resentful of the people around me who supposedly lead ‘easier’ lives. That’s not me. I am not those feelings.

I am not owed anything from the world – there’s no contract, no guarantee.  Tragedy does not live elsewhere, where it is distant and tolerated and accepted as a balance for the cosmos. I am not too young for the unique experiences of my life.

I don’t believe that any of us are protected by anything at all – that we are all an accident or circumstance away from crisis, and this is invigorating for me (perhaps because I have been through it). This makes the highs a bit higher and the lows a bit lower. It helps me to pause and enjoy the world around me. I don’t want to live in a world with bumpers. The fragility of life makes it precious. 

Thanks for reading!



Tuesday, December 3, 2013

Hospital adventure #5, 2013

Hey folks –

I was compelled to post that earlier essay I wrote because I was, at the time, in the hospital. Again. C figured that it was the 5th time I was at Abbott this year. This was one of my longest stays – exactly one week. I went in Sunday afternoon November 10th and got out Sunday afternoon the 17th. A clear week. This was also a stay where I got quite a bit sicker before I started to feel better. Plus, there were a few surprises along the way.

What further complicated being away from school was that my high school lost two students the weekend before I went in – car crash and suicide. It was hard to be away during that time, though I would guess it was even harder to be there.

I mean here to relate what the week was like – what happened and what it was like to experience it. I generally experience narratives like a road trip – chronological, cause effect, linear. You can follow it on a map. Hospital stays feel more like an extended drunken adventure. A chaotic, confused journey. Hospitals are places out of time. True, I generally slept from about 1230 AM to about 6, when it is nighttime. But it is not sleep anymore than lying in bed all day is being awake. Time is punctuated every 3 or 4 hours by having my vitals checked (blood pressure cuff on my arm, thermometer in my mouth, blood oxygen level meter on my finger), having blood drawn, and the error alarms on my IV machine. After a few days of this there is no time.

Tell it right now, nice and easy. Take your time.

There was an instance when I was counting minutes during this stay. I had a pneumonia that was not responding to antibiotics and they wanted to figure out what bug was in my lungs making me sick. C and I are trying to figure out on what day this happened, this procedure where they sedated me and put a scope in my lungs to take some samples. Bronchoscopy. Wednesday.

So because I was to be somewhat put under, I couldn’t eat or drink leading up to this procedure, which was at 11AM. For whatever reason, the ‘nothing by mouth’ started the night before at midnight, when I was extremely thirsty. There have been a few moments of this in my hospital life, where I was not allowed to have anything to drink and was thirsty beyond imagination. My tongue, mouth, throat were dry. I couldn’t swallow. This went on for two hours. I couldn’t stay still. All I could think about was how good cold water would feel in my mouth. An ice cube. Have you been thirsty like this? Every breath made it worse, breathing in a desert. I rinsed my mouth in the sink a few times, which helped for a moment or two. Eventually I gave in and drank the best three glasses of water in my life. It was 2AM – nine hours before this procedure, and it was totally fine.

That was Wednesday – the bronchoscopy. Wednesday afternoon (or possibly Thursday) they did a CT scan on my lungs to see what there was to see. Around this same time, I noticed that my right arm had swelled up around the elbow, just fluid, but I had a fun wobbly arm for the afternoon. They did an ultrasound on my arm and shoulder to look for clots and found one – superior vena cava I think. The ultrasound rooms are nice – dark, warm – the gel used for the scanner is warm. It’s quiet aside from the sounds of the veins they are ‘seeing’ on the ultrasound, which are pulsing and womb-like – wom wom wom wom. There are pretty reds and blues on the screen. On me, I was missing a vein – right side near my collarbone. Same vein where the tech pulled the dialysis catheter in the last entry. Writing this is beginning to feel interminable. It was a week of things like this. I was on oxygen for two days. My creatinine went up to 3.8  (from 2.4) then back down to 2.1. They found a tumor (during the CT scan of my lung) in one of my native kidneys and will remove the kidney sometime this spring. I watched The Avengers, Captain America, Thor, Skyfall, Austin Power and three seasons of The Office (thank you Netflix), but there were two days when I didn’t watch or do anything. At one point when someone asked me why my kidneys failed originally I told them I masturbated too much. That was a highlight.

It is so hard to capture all of this. This reads nothing like all of it. Would pictures help? I guess I could say that at times it felt interminable, like being thirsty, and some days drifted past me without my knowing. Just a different way to be a person I guess. I had to adjust my notion of who I am a few times - being on oxygen was new and scary to me, I didn't friends of family to see me with the tubes on my face, and taking home the blood clot and future surgery were big new things. I am now a person who has 'been on oxygen' and 'has a blood clot', along with everything else. 


Back home now, for a few weeks, the specific memories of my stay are already beginning to slide together. My body is recovering slowly from the pneumonia and whatever went with it, but I am improving by the day. I have passed the point where I don’t remember what not feeling sick was like. I passed it today, but I passed it. That was a great feeling. Thanks for reading!

Friday, November 15, 2013

A Story of Sickness and Personhood

Hey folks - long time no post! I'm going to post a short series of stories and reflections about my health journey, and I thought I'd start with an essay I wrote from last spring. I was taking a class on teaching writing and learned some things that helped me jump start the telling of my own story. I changed it a bit to tamp down some of the academics. Thanks for reading!

A Story of Sickness and Personhood
I share stories with my students. Often the stories are personal. I share them for a number of reasons; to pass time, to further endear the students to me, to give everyone a break from our academic work, and to assert an argument – generally in favor of living life a bit more recklessly than they are encouraged to live. I also tell stories about myself because by telling the stories I’m able to take hold of a human element within myself that becomes obscured in the slog of high school. I’ve told stories about my travels, about particularly eventful times with my friends, about touching or edifying moments in my romantic relationships. However, what might be my most powerful, most human and edifying story of all rarely makes it into my classroom. In fact, it has barely entered my writing of any kind. Even describing it here requires language I don’t feel is available to me. How do I begin? – the events do not occur to me chronologically, or any-logically. How do I bring to the page something that feels both unitary and dispersed across the last 12 years of my life? How to I translate to language something so inherent to who I am that it feels like family? What am I confronting when I attempt to share this story? Even here I struggle to deploy definite language.

It has been my belief that I have struggled with the story of my body in part because the story is enormous and unwieldy, meaning that it would take more skill than I seemed to possess to fashion and fix it into words. Studying different philosophies of writing instruction (and writing itself by extension), I have come to understand my struggle not as a want of ability, but as a positioning within discourses that discourage or forbid I tell my story as I felt and feel it. I have struggled to find the right language, the right narrative position, and the confidence with which to tell my story. I will attempt to bring these discourses, and my discovery of them, to light here.

While the dominant narratives around chronic illness are changing with help from advocacy groups and policies like the ADA, they remain narratives I want nothing to do with. Disability and illness continue to be tinged with the fear of contagion and subsequent stigmatization, or an association of the sick person with weakness or emasculation. I have struggled to talk about my illness in any part for fear of that part overwhelming any other impression of me – to become a chronically ill person, rather than a person with a chronic illness. The first hurdle I have faced is to locate the language that assembles a narrative with which I am comfortable, one that feels genuine to my experience.

This social struggle of how to choose language appropriate to my experience has lead to many winding and long-winded answers to cursory questions, and ultimately to cursory answers. Much of the language available to me is cliché, culled from soap operas (or worse, parodies of soap operas!), language that was easily recognizable to my listener, but felt disingenuous and clunky on my tongue. There were no words I could call upon to being to cover what it was like for me. I should say that when I attempted to delve into these experiences with my whole heart, into crying, empathic descriptions of procedures, even in more private conversation, my listeners, with a few exceptions, became uncomfortable, and I followed suit.

Over years of telling my story, I was rewarded time and again when I positioned myself as unaffected, above the chaotic and unpredictable events of my life. When I would talk about how I continued to bicycle, or teach, or be cheerfully resilient, people would tell me I was strong, that I was handling all of this so well, or that if they were in my shoes they would be such a mess! People would cringe obligingly when I showed scars, but they (or mostly I) were quick to move past how scary surgery can be. My nurses and health care providers were all so impressed with me – when I was a charming, smiling person they would visit with me, chat with me about their days. While I loved the attention and enjoyed the time, this new relationship made it difficult for me to ask for help, to return to my role as patient. Within these narratives, I struggled to maintain my concept of self (masculine, self-possessed) while having a chronic illness and being a patient (emasculated, weak). Dominant narratives of masculinity and heroics positioned me as invulnerable and disaffected.

In addition to finding words that feel right, I have struggled to position myself in relation to a story so integral to me. This initially took the form of ‘not knowing where to start,’ but has evolved into ‘not knowing what to say.’ I find myself wondering how much or what parts of my story a person would need to hear to make sense of the story of my kidney failure (even the words ‘kidney failure’ feel totalizing, and are problematic for me).

Tracing the discourses in which I am positioned, I have found that I am quick to name the concrete facts of my experiences and omit what those experiences were like for me. My stories are bursts of ‘when they removed my tunneled hemodialysis catheter, which had been in place for twice as long as initially planned, the tech put a knee on my shoulder to gain leverage while he tried to pull the catheter from the scar tissue that had secured it to my jugular vein. On the fourth try, the last one before surgery he said, I felt the tug like gravity from my stomach to the top of my head before it broke free from my vein and pulled out of my shoulder. The process, which lasted no more than five minutes, has been one of my most persistent memories.’ This, and others like it, is a series of what happened, rather than what it was like, and at best tells an incomplete version of what happened, missing entirely what it meant. Where am I in this story? I have no authoritative presence here.

The final struggle I face when attempting to position myself in relation to the story of my body over the past 12 years (at least the last one I will deal with here), is how to write about a story that is ongoing, and will continue to be ongoing for me. Stories have for me (including the stories I share with my students) followed a conventional narrative arc, delivering a relatable message from a contained set of events with a beginning, middle and end. There have been segments of my story that played well. I can share the arc of an incident, or a rough period that seems to resolve in the end, but the reality is that there is no ‘end’ to this story, no cure, until MY story is over and buried. Though even THAT is a misnomer, to consider my story complete and fixed at any point. We are continually becoming, evolving. My narrative may then shed the burden of authority over who I am or what my life means. It shifts from an authoritative statement to a representation, a world played out over time, but a world fixed and placed some distance from whoever or whatever me and my sickness are.

In addition to my struggle to appropriate the right language and my struggle to find the best position from which to tell my story, I have struggled with how my story will be received by those who hear or read it. This is not a unique anxiety, as any personal story can seem bound to the person telling it. When I become vulnerable in front of my students, or in an essay, or pretty much anytime, I retreat into my turtle shell. I shy from challenging all of the narratives I’ve mentioned here, in addition to the dread I feel of boring my audience. The more I assume narrative authority over my experience, the further I withdraw from the safety of the conventions that dominate my genre. What has been helpful is the potential of writing as some classmates experienced it. Their responses, indicating that they gained control over the narratives dominating their genres, were exciting and empowering. The story as fired pottery, strong enough to withstand embellishment, and my recognition that my anxieties about my stories are shared by others.

The second tool I have to address my anxiety of reception is the concept of autoethnography, where a person considers themselves as a place to be studied. With this study of the self I treat my story as a place. From this place I am able to employ my telling of my story as a disruption to the narratives that would impede or limit me. The chronically ill young person need not be limited to tragedy or hero. Perhaps obviously, my position as multi-faceted human being with a chronic illness challenges that totalizing narrative. By telling my story as autoethnography, I also gain a new sense of what it means to be me, a critical sense of the discourses that shape the lives of those with chronic illness. By recognizing and distancing myself from the dominant narratives of chronic illness, I can both tell my story less encumbered by those narratives, and I can begin to create a more empowered sense of what it means to be me.


Here’s a story I’ve not yet shared with my students. About once a month I make a trip to my kidney clinic. I go to get my blood levels checked, and sometimes to get a shot that helps me make red blood cells. I enjoy the trips – the nurse I see is practically an old friend of mine. We joke with each other and talk about our lives. She knows what I mean when I tell her things. Last week, when I visited the clinic, a middle-aged woman was having her blood drawn the same time I was, and the four of us – two nurses and two patients – all bantered away in this small room. The woman talked slowly and laughed easily, and for a moment I wondered about her mental state. When she laughed she would leap out of her chair cackling, and slap her knee or bang on the wall. Her nurse was clearly having a hard time getting her to sit still and have her blood drawn. When she finally had the needle ready, the woman waved her off, her breath caught and she started crying. She hated needles, hated having her blood drawn, hated it. Her nurse asked questions about her life, her kids, helped her calm down. Meanwhile, I bared my arm and calmly watched my nurse slide the needle in and draw two vials of blood. ‘See!’ she said, ‘See how good he is?’ She was half kidding. No way, I thought. I told the woman seated next to me that I understood not wanting blood drawn, not wanting the needle stick. That as much as I love these nurses, they do not understand. That sometimes the greatest struggle of organ failure is not surgery, strict diets or a future riddled with complications, but braving the same small needle stick month after month after month after month. I know this. This has become a home for me.

Monday, July 15, 2013

George Zimmerman and Race

I, like many of you, am following the Trayvon Martin and George Zimmerman case closely, as demonstrative of race and crime in the United States. Zimmerman’s verdict was announced yesterday, and there have been protests today and more planned for the rest of the week. It has been a pretty horrible thing all around, and it was made surprisingly worse by this, where a Florida woman got a 20 prison sentence for firing 'warning shots' at her abusive husband, who had threatened her ('If I can't have you, no one will'). The judge decided that 'Stand Your Ground' didn't apply in that case, somehow.

I’ve read dozens of posts about the Zimmerman verdict on Facebook, some personal status posts and other published commentary that are making the rounds. One of these personal posts named a racial element that I believe is significant and rarely named – or quickly dismissed. One of these personal reflections named George Zimmerman as “white” – referring to our country’s sickness of black/white institutional racism. He is not white. He is Hispanic. But the writer knew this and was making a separate point – George Zimmerman is treated by the justice system that acquitted him and the pundits and media that laud him as white. That acceptance into white-ness might have influenced him to become the vigilante that murdered Trayvon Martin in his predominantly white neighborhood.

I learned the history of racism in the US as primarily whites being horribly cruel, then more subtly cruel, to blacks and sometimes other groups of color. It was pretty straight forward, even if it didn’t always make sense. The ‘why’ of racism was always obscure to me, even while its effects were plain and horrifying. Having scratched the surface of race studies, I think I have a broader sense of how racism works in the US.

The theory most salient here is about the instability of whiteness. Historically (and this dynamic is not limited to race) marginalized ‘races’ like Irish immigrants, Polish Immigrants, German Immigrants, etc, have vied for the cultural benefits of whiteness. At the time, citizenship was at stake, as only ‘freed white persons’ could become citizens under the 1790 Naturalization law - and the Irish, Italians, Poles, Germans etc were not immediately welcomed as 'white.' The way these groups frequently gained access to whiteness was by being favorably compared to those ‘less white’ then they. It was a disgusting argument that linked skin color or facial structure (the ‘sciences’ of phrenology and eugenics) with moral behavior, and ultimately fitness for self-governance (read: voting according to white interests). Irish immigrants who had been compared to the ‘native savages’ for decades, attained whiteness in part by selling out Native Americans in the 1850s. Eastern Senators (to the chagrin of western Senators) argued that the ‘Chinese’ were morally superior to the ‘blacks” in the 1880s. This has continued (more information in “Whiteness of a Different Color: European Immigrants and the Alchemy of Race” by Matthew Frye Jacobson).


Living in predominantly white neighborhood, the Hispanic Zimmerman was not ‘white,’ but he was whiter than Martin, or the other young blacks who had burglarized some of the homes in that area. It is part of the sickness of racism that Zimmerman might have wanted to whiten himself by hunting down blacks. 

This in no way excuses Zimmerman - I think he is wholly guilty of an unnecessary and racially driven murder. I mean to say that our white supremacist culture might have played many factors in this situation. Thanks for reading.